Diskussion:Annika Rose: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Sipzz (Diskussion | Beiträge) Neuer Abschnitt →Duplikate |
|||
| Zeile 8: | Zeile 8: | ||
Hi, sorry to have take this in English. But what is the reason/background behind the two articles about the same person? Thinking on [[Annika Bond]] and [[Annika Rose]]. //[[Benutzer:Sipzz|Sipzz]] ([[Benutzer Diskussion:Sipzz|Diskussion]]) 16:20, 5. Aug. 2012 (CEST) | Hi, sorry to have take this in English. But what is the reason/background behind the two articles about the same person? Thinking on [[Annika Bond]] and [[Annika Rose]]. //[[Benutzer:Sipzz|Sipzz]] ([[Benutzer Diskussion:Sipzz|Diskussion]]) 16:20, 5. Aug. 2012 (CEST) | ||
: Hi Sipzz, I agree that normally we would just make a redirect to the Annika Rose article, but since Annika Bond is a trademark of her former studio it has to be discussed with both parties first. Until this is settled, we have two articles. Thanks + cheers, --[[Benutzer:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[Benutzer Diskussion:Till Kraemer|Diskussion]]) 10:50, 8. Aug. 2012 (CEST) | |||